0.5* (out of 5*)
I WAS RUNNING away. I was running away from England, from my childhood, from the winter, from a sequence of untidy, unattractive love-affairs, from the few sticks of furniture and jumble of overworn clothes that my London life had collected around me; and I was running away from drabness, fustiness, snobbery, the claustrophobia of close horizons and from my inability, although I am quite an attractive rat, to make headway in the rat-race. In fact, I was running away from almost everything except the law.
That is not a bad start for a book, is it? It’s intriguing. It tells of a backstory that is about to be revealed, and it foreshadows whatever else is going to happen whilst the character is on the run.
To be honest, when I started the book, I was really looking forward to reading this. Not just because it was the beginning of another fun buddy read, but also because I had not read The Spy Who Loved Me before. I knew the film, of course, but the film, I was advised, bears no resemblance to the book. Not even close. So, after a few decent Bond stories that followed the abysmally bad From Russia With Love, I thought Fleming had maybe found his template. That maybe From Russia With Love was him scraping the bottom of the barrel, and that surely ANY other book had to be better.
Well, I was wrong. I was so wrong.
Also, when reviewing that hot mess that is From Russia With Love, I did mention that it would have been helpful if Fleming had provided a bit more insight into the internal monologue of the books female lead. Yes, I bemoaned that Fleming did not write any part from the female perspective.
Well, folks, it goes to show that I should be careful what I wish for because Fleming did exactly that in The Spy Who Loved Me, and it does not work. What Fleming gives us is Viv, a young Canadian whom we again learn very little about other than she’s been in some seriously messed up relationships. Yes, Fleming defines her through the relationships she’s been in, mostly being taken advantage of.
What doesn’t work about this is that Viv’s own account is just dripping with Fleming’s misogyny. At one point, he has her describe an abortion as follows:
It was as mentally distressing but as physically painless as I had expected, and three days later I was back in my hotel.
That is all Fleming has Viv say about it. Doesn’t sound convincing, does it.
Fleming tries to sell her history as a tough backstory and which is supposed to set Viv up for a resolution to stop being a push-over, be more confident, and not be groped at every turn.
Well, that was the end of that! From now on I would take and not give. The world had shown me its teeth. I would show mine. I had been wet behind the ears. Now I was dry. I stuck my chin out like a good little Canadian (well, a fairly good little Canadian!), and having learnt to take it, decided for a change to dish it out.
So, Viv ends up “on the run” in rural New York, stuck in a short-term motel job, where again she first falls prey to the husband of the owner and then ends up being held for five hours by two thugs who beat her up and threaten her with rape every five minutes. And for a large chunk of the book, this is all the plot there is. Until Bond turns up and saves the day, upon which Bond claims Viv as his reward.
Let’s recap: Viv had just undergone severe beatings, rape and death threats, and the one thing on Bond’s mind is to have sex with her.
The idiotic thing – well, another one, is that Viv, who previously had resolved to escape from abusive relationships, feels she had to go along with Bond’s request.
But I knew in my heart that I had to. He would go on alone and I would have to, too. No woman had ever held this man. None ever would. He was a solitary, a man who walked alone and kept his heart to himself. He would hate involvement. I sighed. All right. I would play it that way. I would let him go. I wouldn’t cry when he did. Not even afterwards. Wasn’t I the girl who had decided to operate without a heart? Silly idiot! Silly, infatuated goose! This was a fine time to maunder like a girl in a woman’s magazine! I shook my head angrily and went into the bedroom and got on with what I had to do.
This is the point in the book when I no longer asked myself if Fleming lost his mind, but whether he had one in the first place.
And as if this wasn’t sick enough, it actually got worse:
I think I know why I gave myself so completely to this man, how I was capable of it with someone I had met only six hours before. Apart from the excitement of his looks, his authority, his maleness, he had come from nowhere, like the prince in the fairy tales, and he had saved me from the dragon. But for him, I would now be dead, after suffering God knows what before. He could have changed the wheel on his car and gone off, or, when danger came, he could have saved his own skin. But he had fought for my life as if it had been his own. And then, when the dragon was dead, he had taken me as his reward. In a few hours, I knew, he would be gone – without protestations of love, without apologies or excuses. And that would be the end of that – gone, finished. All women love semi-rape. They love to be taken. It was his sweet brutality against my bruised body that had made his act of love so piercingly wonderful.
Seriously, what utter bullshit! I have not felt so nauseated and enraged by a book since
From Russia With Love. I had hoped Fleming got his act together in the books that followed, but clearly he was a leopard that could not change his spots, which is a shame because the premise of the book was great. It is just that a misogynist dumbass writing from a point of view he has no interest in understanding or even exploring will inevitably end up with a book full of misogynist dumbassery.
Avoid at all costs.
I felt the same way about this one too!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, dear. Sorry you suffered through this one, too. Did you review it at the time?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I reviewed it on Goodreads here https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1566829090?book_show_action=false&from_review_page=1
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great. Thanks! 🙂
Excellent review. Ian Fleming is not my thing. I tried “Moonraker” once and gave up through lack of interest.
Your review helps me understand why I don’t like him and why he was so immensely popular: he’s wish-fulfillment face of violent, narcissistic, misogyny. He’d be the perfect hero for the Trump generation, if only he was American, a billionaire and liked to indulge in “locker room talk” when travelling on buses with men he barely knows.
I think Viv is a character many men would like to exist. A woman grown used to abuse. A woman one could not be accused of corrupting because she sees herself as no longer being an innocent. A woman who has enough spirit left to be fun to play with rather that a sad and apathetic burden. A woman you can use, tell yourself and her that she has cause to be grateful and then move on as if having had a particularly satisfying piss against a wall.
Sorry, my disgust is making me ramble.
Anyway, thanks for the warning on this one. Some of my reading is nostalgic and might have led me to waste time on this crap.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. BL is kinda slow loading comments today, but I commented there, too. 🙂
The book and author lend themselves to rants. It was a truly sickening reading experience.
I was also stumped of how there was, with the exception of the two policemen at the very end of the book, not one decent male character in the whole book. Seriously, not a single one. Unless, of course Fleming truly believed Bond was a decent fellow…