Since moving away from Booklikes and finding my feet on other platforms again such as this WP blog, LibrarThing and Goodreads, I find these weekly reading updates very useful. Without them, I would find it difficult to remember what I have read in the previous week. Not all books are brilliant, and some aren’t even memorable. Some books are memorable but memory of when I started or finished them may not be reliable because some books stay with me long after I have closed them.

Some books I forget almost instantly. This week Annie Haynes’ The Bungalow Mystery was just such a book. This was my second dip into Haynes’ work and initially the book was thrilling: a doctor is called to a neighbour’s house to discover that the neighbour has been killed. Then out of the blue the doctor discovers a young woman hiding behind a curtain and decides to help her make an escape. It was a thrilling start.
Unfortunately, the story then turned to a plot twist that derailed both the plot and the suspense that had started to build. The story never got on track for me. Worst of all, the solution of the story was predictable, but there was no way that the reader was given a fair chance to discover the motive that was revealed at the end. Unless of course, I missed it completely while we were chasing red herrings all over the place. That I missed it is is entirely possible. I was so bored by the middle of the story that I just wished it would end as soon as possible. Still, I believe The Bungalow Mystery was Haynes’ first mystery, so it was to be expected that it would not be a polished piece of work of an experienced writer.
I still have a few of her books at hand and I will continue to explore Haynes’ work. I’m intrigued to see if and how the books change over time.

I also managed to finish Mary Beard’s S.P.Q.R. I’ve said this in previous reading updates, but I thought the book was absolutely fantastic. I love how Beard told the story of the rise of Rome not merely by listing dates and wars and the names of famous generals and consuls but also included a description of the lives of ordinary Romans, and how the political events affected the people, or didn’t affect the people in some cases.
The rest of the week I focused on trying to close out other books that I had started so that I could go into this year’s Halloween Bingo (starting on 1st Sept.) with as few distractions as possible.

I had started Uwe Timm’s book Halbschatten a few month ago but never could get into the right mood to continue reading it. It’s not an easy read. It tells the story a man who visits a graveyard in Berlin that is known to be the final resting place of mostly people associated with the military. The man meets a guide who offers to help him find the grave he is looking for: the pilot Marga von Etzdorf, the first woman hired to fly for an airline, and the first woman to fly solo across Siberia, from Germany to Tokyo, Japan, and who committed suicide under mysterious circumstances after crashing her plane in Syria in 1933.
I loved the book.
As I said, it is not an easy read, because we do not only get the story of Marga von Etzdorf, but we also get the story of the rise of Nazim, stories of the war, stories that are hard to read.
Howver, I much appreciated what Timm did here by structuring the book as a version of Dante’s Divine Comedy. So, when I finally got stuck into the book, I had to finish it in one sitting. For me, Halbschatten proved to be a perfect balance of lit fic, mystery, history, and discussion of issues. I even liked the way that Timm wrote from the women’s point of view, which is not always a given. Halbschatten was my first book by Timm and I look forward to reading more by him.

And as I still had time for another book before picking up my first Halloween Bingo book (we were allowed to pick one book as a head-start), I also read Fred Uhlman’s novella Reunion, which was a perfect follow-up to Halbschatten. Reunion tells the story of two boys who came from different backgrounds and became friends at school. However, the rise of Nazism caused a rift between them. The novella is based on Uhlman’s own life, but I am not sure whether it is entirely autobiographical. It was Uhlman’s only book, and is not well-known. It should be, tho. It was well-written, and packs a punch, even for someone who has read many similar stories. When reading the novella, I was reminded of the style of Joseph Roth (Hiob, Radetzkymarsch, etc.) which much added to my enjoyment. I was also reminded that it is this kind of forgotten writing that makes it so difficult for me to enjoy historical fiction. I think I will always prefer fiction “of its time”.
I only came across Reunion on Saturday night when Ali Smith talked about the book, or rather the author, in her interview event at the Edinburgh Book Festival this year. Uhlman’s story was one of the stories that Smith incorporated into her latest book, Summer. Summer, much like the rest of Smith’s Seasonal Quartet, is also very much fiction “of its time”, of our time.
And this is it. Most of my books for the next two months will be titles that I pick for our annual Halloween Bingo game.
Other reviews posted this week:
None.
Pity about Hayes, but it sounds like your reading week finished on a real high!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It did. Halbschatten was not at all what I expected and I loved it. I don’t even mind not knowing whether Timm took liberties with the historical figure at the end of the book (well, in respect of one of the main plot points actually).
I’m hoping for a similar development this week. To be fair, books can only improve after Macbeth. I switched to the audiobook (which will be returned to Audible when I am done) so I can actually do other things while getting through the book. I’ll finish it tomorrow. This is one that I can listen to while working – it does not require a lot of thinking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ugh. “Macbeth” does sound dreadful (though I’m waiting for your review with great interest). As for Timm, I guess I’ll have to learn how to adapt the “add to library / TBR” shortcuts we used on BL to this new BL-less existence …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Re Macbeth. It will be a rant, but of all of the things that really don’t work for me, the absolute worst is that Nesbo managed to make this story absolutely mind-numbingly boring. It’s like an action movie that is all car chases and gun fights … without much else. And what sort of character there is is so shallow it’s stupid. Of course, most of all I hate what he’s done to Lady M, but all of the other characters are also entirely lifeless. And the portrayal of the story as a 1970s drama based on a corrupt police force is just … lazy. It doesn’t even rise to a good 1970s police drama. All the way through this, I have been much reminded how well-written the early Karen Pirie novels are. This on the other hand is like a bad episode of TJ Hooker.
Oh and there is literally no local atmosphere at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Uh, oh. And there I was staying away from the book chiefly for its excessive violence contents …
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know what? The violence is as ridiculous as the rest of the book, it’s not even all that scary because it is surrounded by and based on so much bull. Again, nothing like the Tony Hill books.
The scene about Lady M and the child is gruesome BUT again by the time I got to it, it had already been alluded to and I called BS then because it was such an inconceivable change to the character in the play that it just annoyed me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sigh. Sounds like a *real* train wreck.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s pretty much it. I’m just so annoyed that this happened to be my first bingo pick. LoL.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Things really *can* only go up from here …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup.
LikeLiked by 1 person