Review:
The Boy Who Followed Ripley, published in 1980, is the 4th book in the Tom Ripley series, and seems to be quite different to the other installments.
In this one, Tom is sought out in his home in France by an American teenage runaway who asks him for a job. Tom agrees to hire him as a help in the garden. As they get to know each other, Tom learns more about the reasons why Billy/Frank ran away from home and sees some similarities between himself and the boy.
Then the story takes a turn that leads us to follow the two to Berlin where Billy/Frank is kidnapped…….
This book seriously had me scratching my head – I don’t even know where to start taking this apart: Should I start with the obvious flaw? Yes? OK – plot holes. So, so, many of them and they start right at the beginning. Why did Billy/Frank seek out Tom? Why does he tell him his motivations? Why do they need to go to Berlin? How do they end up in the gay bar scene? (I mean, I get why, so the question is really how?) Why the kidnapping? And here I’m really puzzled as to how this would even be practicable……. I have so, so many questions. Very little of this book made sense. Least of all the Frank’s letter.
Did Highsmith write this one purely for the money? I mean, there are a lot of details about the French tax authorities in this book that sound similar to what Highsmith was dealing with. Her relations with the French tax authorities were, erm, “strained”, so maybe that was one of the motivations for the book.
However, there was also something rather mellow in the way that Tom looked after Frank and in that Tom seemed to have a lot more patience for other people than in the first book. (I have not yet read books 2 and 3.) And something about this more personable side seemed to reflect something of the author. At least, it seemed to reflect some of what my impression is about the author after reading a few of her books, and this made The Boy Who Followed Ripley still somewhat intriguing.
Andrew Wilson (in Beautiful Shadow: A Life of Patricia Highsmith) notes that Highsmith conceived the idea of this book after she had to deal with inheritance issues, and that she wrote to her editor that she wanted to explore the theme of legacy. I do believe this does indeed come across in the book – on one hand we have Frank and his father and brother, who are one line of legacy and on the other we have the similar personae of Tom and Frank. The central point of issue being that The Boy Who Followed Ripley actually rejects Tom’s motivations as strongly as he rejects the motivations of his own family – both of them being financial gain.
I honestly don’t know what to make of the book. On one hand there there are certainly some interesting themes – Ripley’s morals, questions about gender/sexuality, the topic of legacy – but on the other hand, the lack of flow of the book and the rocky plot make it bit of a chore to read.
Original post:
BrokenTune.booklikes.com/post/1505208/the-boy-who-followed-ripley
Ok, this one is the one the biography mentions:
Purple Noon – Alain Delon as Tom Ripley (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054189/)
😀
LikeLike
I’ve not anything by her either but I loved the film version of The Talented Mr Ripley.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love that film, too. The version with Matt Damon has the perfect cast in it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was that version has there been another?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I believe so. I’ll have to look it up but I think there is an earlier version – it was mentioned in the biography about Highsmith that I read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll pop over to Imdb now!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm,… I can’t see it on Imdb. I will look it up in the biography when I get home.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe it was a really bad version and needs to be forgotten. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ummm,……
Seriously, I’m puzzled now. I’m sure there was a discussion in the book about which actor was her favourite for the role of Tom Ripley.
LikeLike
I’ve never read any Patricia Highsmith – I keep meaning to rectify this, but I never do. Maybe in 2017!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would love to know what you make of her writing. Her take on thrillers/mystery is certainly different. Dark and quirky – I really like most the ones I’ve read by her, but like her, her books and characters are full of conflicts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really want to read The Price of Salt and Carol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really, really liked The Price of Salt (later re-named “Carol”). It’s “romance” with proper issues – or at least without the tropes that make me avoid the genre as a whole most of the time. Also, when reading it (before I saw the film), I had to picture the story as a Hitchcock movie about a road trip. I really enjoyed it – especially that the characters were not sugary or even likable.
I would also recommend The Cry of the Owl. It was quietly disturbing but entertaining.
LikeLike
You are really pushing out the reviews today. Anything in particular driving this?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess I got over the reviewing slump. Finally. I haven’t posted a new review in quite a while – well, I guess I read more books than I have reviewed lately, so just trying to catch up. I won’t spam you feed with everything, tho. I’ll limit it to the books that I actually had thoughts about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fire away! The more the merrier…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha. Thanks. More to follow tomorrow. It’s nearing 1:30am… 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I keep forgetting you’re in a different time zone.
LikeLiked by 1 person